subscribe

Home

Zak Smith, Attorney, Marine Mammal Protection Project, Santa Monica

News in the world of whales last week (or close to it).

Okay, let’s start with some dolphin news.

  • The big news last week was the mass stranding of dolphins that continued throughout the week in Cape Cod.  It started on January 14 with the stranding of about 30 dolphins and appears to have ended at the close of the weekend after a total of 90 dolphins stranded, making it the largest dolphin beaching in years.  Rescuers not only saved dolphins that were trapped on shore, but also helped about 300 dolphins swim out of Wellfleet Harbor, where they were at risk of stranding.  Scientists do not know why the animals strand, but it is not unusual for a high number of dolphins to strand this time of year on the Cape, although these numbers are startling. 
  • Speaking of dolphins, while I am not a fan of “swim with dolphin” attractions  (I think all marine mammals that are capable of making it in the wild should be released and those that can’t shouldn’t be exploited for our entertainment), if they are going to exist I’m glad that swimming with dolphins provides wounded soldiers some solace
  • One of the reasons I don’t support dolphin attractions is because of research showing how intelligent and self-aware they are.  This article discusses the research and rightfully questions why such studies aren’t mentioned on SeaWorld’s website (which devotes enormous space to discussing and disseminating other information on marine mammals but omits any research that indicates the intellectual and emotional sophistication of these animals).  It’s unethical to exploit such species for our entertainment in light of this research.  According to Thomas I. White, a Fellow at the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, “There is now ample scientific evidence that capacities once thought to be unique to humans are shared by these beings.  Like humans, whales and dolphins are ‘persons’.  That is, they are self-aware beings with individual personalities and a rich inner life.  They have the ability to think abstractly, feel deeply and choose their actions.  Their lives are characterized by close, long-term relationships with conspecifics in communities characterized by culture.  In short, whales and dolphins are a who, not a what.”  Yeah, what he said. 
  • In defense of our laws protecting dolphins, it’s great to see that the US is appealing a WTO ruling against US dolphin-safe tuna labeling
  • Finally in dolphin news, a Hong Kong conservation group has set up a DNA bank for the rare Chinese white dolphin.  There are about 2,500 Chinese white dolphins in the body of water between Macau and Hong Kong and experts say their numbers have dropped significantly in the past few years because of the usual litany of problems:  increase in maritime traffic, water pollution, habitat loss, and coastal development.  So, the Ocean Park Conservation Foundation Hong Kong has joined hands with a Chinese university to set up a DNA bank.  According to Judy Chen, the foundation chairwoman, “We hope to offer the scientific community a standardized genetic analysis platform to assess the sustainability of Chinese whit dolphin populations.  The collected datat will provide important reference to governments in the region for developing critical strategies of Chinese white dolphin conservation.”  I hope it’s not too little, too late. 
  • Let’s kill seals, they’re eating our cod.  Yep, you read that right.  A study has come out showing seals should be blamed for cod’s failure to recover off Nova Scotia.  Turns out that seals love to eat.  Go figure.  And they’re eating lots of cod.  Of course, this will only support the Canadian government’s proposal to wipe out about 70 percent of the grey seals in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence.  Ah, Canada, just when I thought you couldn’t have an even more horrible conservation record. 
  • Very interesting news coming out of Britain.  I’m not going to jump for joy just yet, until I do more research, but it looks live British naval ships could be forced to scale back its use of sonar off Cornwall’s coast to protect dolphins and whales.  If this turns out to be true, it will be a significant step in the right direction.
  • A Western Pacific gray whale from Russia just passed through Southern California waters.  The female whale, Varvara, is from a critically endangered population of fewer than 100 individuals.  It’s becoming increasingly clear that the Western Pacific gray whales use the same breeding and calving area as the Eastern Pacific gray whales (Baja California), although their summer feeding grounds are different. 
  • Wow, during the past ten years alone, cetacean bycatch in South Korean waters accounted for 33% of global large whale mortality from bycatch.  According to a new study, Cetacean By-Catch in the Korean Peninsula—by Chance or by Design? by Douglas MacMillan and Jeonghee Han, this high level of bycatch is no accident, but is actually deliberate and supported by South Korean laws that ban whaling outright but allow the sale of whale meat and other products if the whales are caught “accidentally” when fishing.  This legal loophole also encourages the illegal hunting of whales, which can then be sold on the market described as bycatch.  Ugh. 
  • In a surprising turn of events, the circle of life is alarming some scientists as orcas and other predators are targeting and killing Steller sea lion pups.  Okay, I jest, it’s not the circle of life that’s alarming them, it’s the status of endangered Steller sea lions and how this predation may set back their chance of surviving as a species.  According to researchers, there are not enough Steller sea lions born each year to rejuvenate their populations, which has declined by 80 percent from a peak about forty years ago.  Markus Horning, a marine mammal expert at Oregon State University’s Hatfield Marine Science Center says, “As the density of more ‘profitable’ adults declines, more juveniles may be targeted and never grow to adulthood, which makes rebuilding their populations problematic.”  It’s a classic vicious cycle.  Let’s hope these sea lions find a way to break it.

Meanwhile, this week in Wales…

First Minister Carwyn Jones says that austerity’s not working.  He’s right; the British government’s economic policy has been a disaster.  Responding to GDP figures showing contraction in the final quarter of 2011, the First Minister said, “The figures confirm what we have been telling the UK Government for some time – their economic policies are simply not working.  The cuts being imposed on Wales are too deep, too fast – and we now face the very real prospect of a double dip recession.”  Yep, heckuva job George Osborne.

Read more

The list of “trashy fashion” creations grows longer every day – shoes made from plastic bottles, underwear made from wood and even a gown made from Ford Focus parts. But when we saw Italian artist Ivano Vitali‘s crochet...
Read more

Kaid Benfield, Director, Sustainable Communities, Washington, DC

  cartoon from xkcd via NRDC's OnEarth website

Cartoon from xkcd via NRDC's OnEarth website.

Kaid Benfield writes (almost) daily about community, development, and the environment.  For more posts, see his blog's home page.  Please also visit NRDC’s sustainable communities video channel.

Read more

A special commission on nuclear waste is not bullish on the near-term prospects for reprocessing it so that the uranium and plutonium it contains can be reused..
Read more

Michael Davidson, China Climate Fellow, Washington, DC

Over the last three days here at the UN in New York City, I have heard a lot of criticisms of the “zero” draft outcome document for the June Rio+20 Earth Summit. Countries have passionately lambasted its lack of “vision”, “ambition”, “balance” and “action-oriented outcomes”; yet, few are able to propose anything beyond copy-and-pasting what has been going through the UN system for two generations. The Future We Want – the title of the zero draft itself reflecting the world’s best intentions to make this a “Rio for twenty-somethings” – has ballooned once again into a long litany of principles and vague, far-off goals. As Rio+20 may be the largest event in the history of the United Nations, these last five months prior to meeting in June need to be used more wisely.

Last November, NRDC, Road to Rio+20, SustainUS, We Canada, MobilizeUS and others helped deliver a Citizens Petition to the UN calling for “world leaders to recognize the urgency of the current situation” by “specific commitments to real actions from governments at all levels, corporations, communities and civil society groups.” Almost 7,000 global citizens made their voice heard in the petition, amplifying the voices of thousands more who have called out weak implementation, corruption, and lack of accountability of the current approach to sustainable development. The education and employment for the growing billions of young people are essential, as well as ensuring that the development patterns we inherit are sustainable.

What “action-oriented outcomes” will live up to this challenge? First, if you haven’t read it yet, our brief submission to the UN includes a set of around 40 achievable commitments that have short- to medium-term impacts. We’ve laid out how we must go forward during these negotiations on clean energy and fighting climate change, and oceans protection. We’ve also put forward sensible proposals for delivering green jobs for youth. This June, I hope that our very top leaders in government and the private sector come to Rio prepared to deliver on:

  • Phasing out environmentally-harmful subsidies
  • Scaling up renewable energy and energy efficiency
  • Reducing wasteful plastic pollution that ends in our oceans
  • Stopping destructive fishing practices
  • Implementing national green economy transition plans
  • Training and equipping the next generation of green jobs holders

What remains, of course, is following up on these commitments and measuring progress toward global targets such as the proposed Sustainable Development Goals. We’re committed to making this the Summit that makes promises stick. The zero draft document calls for a registry/compendium of commitments – taking ideas from position statements of the U.S. and G77/China. We want countries, corporations, and communities to publish their commitments on a web-based registry, promise to report on their progress, and be accessible and responsive to the publicWe are proposing a web-based registry that would turn the power of the internet generation into effective grassroots governance at a global level.

registry.jpg

St. Vincent and the Grenadines commented yesterday, “If the Rio+20 document is simply plagiarized from previous UN conferences, we will have failed to recognize this historic opportunity.” We completely agree. Let’s try something different. For example, last November, young people from 118 countries came up with a simple five-page statement of the urgency and need for action. Surely, world governments can as well – and match their words with action now.

 

 

Read more

Elizabeth Shope, Advocate, Washington, D.C.

With just two months before World Water Day on March 22, NRDC, CARE & WaterAid in America have published our annual report about how the United States is doing in implementing the recommendations we made last year to improve water and sanitation delivery for developing countries. We made four key recommendations, and while some progress has been made, there is still much work to be done. We are hopeful that World Water Day 2012 will not only be a time for educating the public and key decision-makers about global water, sanitation, and hygiene issues, but also that it will serve as a motivator for the U.S. government to take major actions to deliver clean water and sanitation services more efficiently and to the people who need it most.

Specifically, we recommended that the United States should:

  • Develop a comprehensive water strategy. The Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act of 2005 called for such a strategy within 180 days from passage of the legislation, but now, over six years later, this strategy has still not been completed. This strategy is critical for enabling the U.S. to set priorities and be efficient in its work to bring water and sanitation to the developing world – and do so coordinated with and integrated into programs and strategies for food security, global health, education, environment, climate change and more. My colleague Lisa Schectman at WaterAid in America has written more about the importance of this water strategy here.
  • Take a comprehensive view of water, sanitation, and hygiene, by integrating planning and budgeting meaningfully with a wider water strategy, including water productivity and water resources management, food security, health, and climate change. There have been some positive steps on this front. For example, the “Zero Draft” of the outcome document for the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development includes important provisions about safe drinking water and sanitation. However, we can do better: political will for comprehensive integration still needs to be demonstrated in a formal water strategy and project implementation.
  • Strive to make global progress through U.S. leadership. Several key elements that would facilitate U.S. leadership are elevating and solidifying the senior water advisor positions within USAID and the State Department; increasing expertise and capacity of those working on the ground; and improving funding for clean water and sanitation – which currently amounts to less than one one-hundredth of a percent of the federal budget. Read more about U.S. leadership on water in my colleague Heather Allen's blog here.
  • Deliver water, sanitation and hygiene to those who need it most. It is important to prioritize funding for countries that have the greatest need for increased access to safe water and sanitation, and those in which assistance can be expected to make the greatest difference. However, only 33 percent of USAID funding for water, sanitation and hygiene went to low income countries in 2010 based on the most recent State Department report to Congress.

The goal of World Water Day is to raise awareness and call for stronger commitments and more robust action to ensure universal access to safe drinking water and sanitation. Nearly a billion people lack access to safe drinking water, and two out of every five people lack adequate sanitation. While World Water Day is instrumental in educating the public and decision makers about global water issues, training advocates, and setting goals, we should also use the two months leading up to World Water Day as a time to focus on making progress towards achieving these goals. It’s time to get serious about ending this injustice, and doing so in a way that is efficient and sustainable – economically, for the longevity of the projects, and for the environment.

Read more

User:
Password:

| Register | Lost password?